Long-run savings with RESILIA tissue bioprosthetic valves1
When deciding whether to use a tissue valve or mechanical valve for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), key factors include expected durability, the potential for reoperation, the patient’s expected lifespan after the operation, and other lifestyle preferences.
While studies have identified health outcomes associated with tissue and mechanical valves for SAVR, only recently have researchers investigated the expected trajectory of US health system costs associated with the different valve types.
One study published in 2023 quantifies the expected 15-year run savings when using a RESILIA tissue valve relative to a mechanical valve for SAVR.
About the economic evaluation study
In this study, two SAVR cohort models (tissue vs. mechanical) of 10,000 patients were used to estimate disease progression over a 15-year period. The first 5 years for RESILIA tissue data was based on results from the COMMENCE trial, and the additional 10 years relied on weighted data from three primary legacy long-term tissue valve studies.1-4
Savings potential with RESILIA tissue
Based on the data evaluated, the discounted cumulative savings associated with RESILIA tissue valves is significant:
- $8,872 at 5 years
- $20,498 projected at 15 years
RESILIA tissue valves are anticipated to accrue approximately 30% to 50% larger savings than legacy tissue valves when compared to mechanical valves.
The RESILIA tissue difference*
RESILIA tissue is made with advanced anti-calcification technology, designed for extended durability.5 In addition to this unique benefit, this study demonstrates the possible savings with RESILIA tissue.
SAVR with RESILIA tissue valves may further reduce future health system expenditures relative to mechanical valves due to the potential lower rate of reoperation compared to legacy tissue technology.
*No clinical data are available that evaluate the long-term impact of RESILIA tissue in patients. RESILIA tissue tested against tissue from commercially-available bovine pericardial valves from Edwards in a juvenile sheep model. Flameng, et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015;149:340-5.
Want to see more data from the economic evaluation study?
Subscribe
Sign up for future updates related to Edwards Lifesciences news!