RESILIA tissue surgical valve portfolio
Discover the RESILIA tissue portfolio difference
RESILIA Tissue Durability
Future Focused
Innovation built on a proven platform
RESILIA tissue valves are built on the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT valve platform, whose performance is backed by 30 years of durability data, including the largest long-term study of a bioprosthetic valve.
Innovation that transformed the tissue valve landscape
RESILIA tissue technology
RESILIA tissue* builds on the trusted ThermaFix process and is treated with a novel preservation technology to resist calcification more effectively and allow for dry storage.1
+ Calcium-blocking technology
Stable-capping permanently blocks free aldehydes to prevent calcium binding within the tissue
+ Glycerolization
Mitigates calcium-attracting glutaraldehyde residuals and enables dry tissue storage for increased ease of use
72% less calcium content after 8 months
RESILIA tissue showed significant improvement in calcium-blocking properties1
(follow-up exceeded the 5-month duration required by regulatory agencies)
*No clinical data are available that evaluate the long-term impact of RESILIA tissue in patients.
†RESILIA tissue tested against tissue from commercially available bovine pericardial valves from Edwards in a juvenile sheep model. Flameng, et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149:340-345.
Taking performance and durability to new heights
The RESILIA tissue surgical valve portfolio is backed by a strong, growing base of clinical evidence attesting to its hemodynamic performance and durability. RESILIA tissue treatment has been applied to INSPIRIS and MITRIS valves and the KONECT aortic valved conduit.
Clinically stable hemodynamics2,3
Durability data2,3
RESILIA tissue valves showed less SVD-related HVD vs conventional valves in a comparison of COMMENCE and PARTNER IIA trials4
Innovation that keeps future procedures in mind
1 / 4
Featured products
Explore our current RESILIA tissue surgical valve portfolio
References
- Flameng W, et al. A randomized assessment of an advanced tissue preservation technology in the juvenile sheep model. J Thorac Cardiovac Surg. 2015; 149:340-5.
- Beaver T, Bavaria J, Griffith B, et al. Seven-year outcomes following aortic valve replacement with a novel tissue bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023;x:1-11.
- Heimansohn DA, Baker C, Rodriguez E, et al. Mid-term outcomes of the COMMENCE trial investigating mitral valve replacement using a bioprosthesis with a novel tissue. JTCVS Open. 2023;15:151-163.
- Bartus K, Bavaria J, Thourani V, et al. Structural hemodynamic valve deterioration durability of RESILIA-tissue versus contemporary aortic bioprostheses. J Comp Eff Res. 2023;12(3):e220180.
- Saxon JT, Allen K, Cohen D, et al. Bioprosthetic valve fracture during valve-in-valve TAVR: bench to bedside. Interv Cardiol. 2018;13(1):20-26.
- Saxon JT, Allen K, Cohen D, et al. Complications of bioprosthetic valve fracture as an adjunct to valve-in-valve TAVR. Structural Heart. 2019;3(2):92-99.
- Wang DD, O’Neill B, Caranasos T, et al. Comparative differences of mitral valve-in-valve implantation: A new mitral bioprosthesis versus current mosaic and epic valves. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;99(3):934-942.
